~2 min read|
Silent meeting offer several advantages over conventional, spoken meetings:
Silent meetings allow everyone to participate simultaneously and in multiple roles. This is in stark contrast to conventional meetings where participation options are dictated by the use of “talking space” or “air time.” Only one person can occupy that role at a time, which means the only option for everyone else is to listen. In silent meetings, you can engage in reading or commenting and flit back and forth.
Not only can everyone participate suddenly, but who and how they participate changes as well. Women, minorities, introverts, and others are talked over or have trouble getting their voice heard in traditional meetings.1
It’s often useful to amplify certain comments. In a spoken meeting, however, this requires air time. As noted above, this isn’t something everyone is comfortable doing.
In silent meetings, participants are free to weigh in through comments, cursor voting2, etc.
Moreover, as everyone reads through the document and actively participates - by editing, asking questions in comments, etc. - areas which are relatively untouched can reveal broad consensus (or uncertainty). A facilitator might note this but does not need to spend time on this topic (though silence on a topic does not necessarily mean agreement).
Hi there and thanks for reading! My name's Stephen. I live in Chicago with my wife, Kate, and dog, Finn. Want more? See about and get in touch!